The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the disease of affluence which are kind of talking about before when we were shooting the bow that's the more that we the more that we get and the more that we have the opportunity to outsource all of this internal movement function towards technology that's where we get into this slippery slope because we're applauded for that because it's a it's an indication that you're winning the Western game but at a biological level your body is like oh no no we needed that to survive
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.