The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think we would break it up into the acute traumatic events which are most often fractures but can be also dislocations and then we then we would say the wear and tear type injuries which are usually start in middle age and go on into older age and then the um and then the actual um what was the third that we were talking about um we said that for oh oh and then and then the um the absolute degenerative arthritic types of problems
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.