Peter Attia· MD
is it safe to assume basically all three-year-olds move really really well like they haven't uh started to get into the habituated uh movement patterns that will begin to destroy them right
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
is it safe to assume basically all three-year-olds move really really well like they haven't uh started to get into the habituated uh movement patterns that will begin to destroy them right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so uh voita and and others talk about usually what they see is around 70 percent of new you know infants are going to have that healthy central nervous system maturation uh go through the first weeks of life the postural foundations the three to 12 months the subcortical and then from two four to six six years of age you have more of the cortical maturation where you see fine motor dexterity and movement you know ability to write and you see the language develop and you see motor learning