The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when I see these people in their 60s just retired and they come to do their first test and one year later they come back I mean it gives me the Goosebumps because it is like oh my gosh like how can you improve so much and and they're they're like and they're say like look I'm I'm 64 and I I I feel strong as as when I was in my 30s
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.