The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
as we're breathing through our nose as well that that restriction on the breath causes us to use more but diaphragmatic muscles so that breath starts to come down more into the low ribs and the back and acts as like a subtle traction for the back
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when i do that i instantly calm down why well my diaphragm is now engaged better it's not that it's never working and this is a big misnomer we can go over this in a little bit but the the idea of diaphragmatic breathing i've got it i'm really working on getting pts and gpgs like the whole physical therapy community to stop talking like this because there's no such thing as not diaphragmatic breathing if you didn't diaphragmatically breathe you'd be on an iron lung that's called odin's curse it's a pro it's where the phrenic nerve doesn't work okay we're using it it's just we may be in a really poor position and when we breathe through the nose i'm actually pulling that diaphragm down deeper which allows me to get into lower lobes where there's more parasympathetic nerves
where i'm uh um i'm actually diffusing more co2 and o2 so we've got better diffusion