The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there is probably no more diagnostic test that is uncorrelated from Clinical outcome than an MRI of the lumbar spine again not a specialist but I you know I've spoken with lumbar Specialists like Stu McGill um you know they say you know it's it's data it's kind of like a dexa it's like its data but you know it shouldn't really dictate treatment treatment should be based on pain and what triggers your pain
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.