We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
and you know but if you're a i didn't mention radiation is another you know we see people who do fluoroscopy like health professionals who are involved and exposed to ionizing radiation i mean if you are the if you're the tech worker if you're the ship captain who smokes uh on a boat that's carrying nuclear waste and you're diabetic you're gonna get cataracts uh a lot sooner a lot sooner yeah yeah
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.