The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i don't care if i live to 100 and don't have cancer if i'm an invalid for the last 25 years and i can't play with my grandkids and throw a ball like it for me personally i'm not saying that's a that's not a view that everyone should take in the world i'm just telling you that's my view
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think most people would rather live to 90 and die of a heart attack while swimming in the ocean but being you know otherwise in remarkable shape than live to 120 and spend the last 30 years of that unable to do much