The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so the reason that we crave air is because of that co2 build-up if you take out air for a little bit just like a fast in a sense you're like fasting from air all of a sudden our body becomes more resistant to that build-up of co2 and you become a more robust respirator
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
being able to tolerate it a little bit of co2 retention is probably a really good thing
this is like the Buteyko style of breathing yes exactly it's kind of yeah being able to tolerate it a little bit of co2 retention is probably a really good thing