The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the skeletons shrunk the length of the femur and the humerus shrunk there were many more lesions in the skulls which is called parotic hyperostosis spongiform change in the skull that we know is due to deficiencies of iron and other minerals there are tuberculous lesions in the spine and long bones that become much more prevalent there's evidence for poorly healed fractures there's evidence for all sorts of really significant decline in human health
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.