The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
to me it was just so astounding that you could get structural changes in the heart essentially is reversing the Aging Heart by just about 20 years from doing this vigorous intensity exercise protocol in 50y olds that were sedentary
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
After this 2 years of exercise, they measured their hearts, you know, of course, they measured up baseline and their hearts grew and become and became more flexible so much that it was reversed about 20 years of aging. So, their hearts actually looked like a 30-year-old heart rather than a 50-year-old heart.