The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if people are willing to do shorter interval workouts provided they don't get injured that's always the fear i have when people jump right into these high intensity interval workouts without any of the foundational strength that goes into it if the alternative is doing nothing well then it's better but i guess secretly i just hope that i can convince people that they're better off learning to love exercise
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
hey if people are willing to do shorter interval workouts provided they don't get injured that's always the fear i have when people jump right into these high intensity interval workouts without any of the foundational strength that goes into it
and I guess on some level that's where I've become a little bit more accepting of the fact that hey if people are willing to do shorter interval workouts provided they don't get injured that's always the fear I have when people jump right into these high-intensity interval workouts without any of the foundational strength that goes into it — if the alternative is doing nothing well then it's better but I guess secretly I just hope that I can convince people that they're better off learning to love exercise