The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
well the intensity that people can actually get to in real life we should that's where the 60 second on 60 second off protocol came from because it's like it's easier for people to accept 60 seconds pretty hard than it is to expect them to imagine the you know homicidal drill sergeant behind them yelling at them to get all of it out of themselves in 30 seconds
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the the first hit protocol was Windgate tests which is like 30 seconds all out and anyone who's done a Windgate test you know if you do it in the lab they're screaming at you it's like you know we're going to shoot your mother if you don't go as hard as you can and you get every people puke after Windgate tests so the the the original protocol was four Windgate tests with seven minutes rest cuz that's how hard they are going back
well in real life what's what are people going to do their answer initially wasn't like we should make it shorter it was well the intensity that people can actually get to in real life we should that's where the 60-second on 60c off protocol came from cuz it's it's like it's easier for people to accept 60 seconds pretty hard than it is to expect them to imagine the you know homicidal drill surgeon behind them yelling at them to get all of it out of themselves in 30 seconds