The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
She's I think that she did this in Detroit and Ann Arbor. And what she did was she went in and started looking at bee colonies that are in urban environments that are feeding on the dandelions and the local plants and the local food. And what she's finding in the comb and the honey is trace amounts of lead and arsenic and all this stuff.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.