The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The problem here is that this is nutritional reductionism and I'll show a series of studies that show that if you eat a whole food, people may refer back to the podcast I did with Stephen Van Vliet and talking about the differences in the way that the body might respond even in the arterial level or the endothelial level to a whole food like a strawberry or honey which we know has nitric oxide precursors in it.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.