The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
conversely if you have a a tumor that is in a low te environment I.E the original Publications we talked about an N anym way back or other anecdotal series those low the tumors that develop in a low te environment they're less dependent on androgens to grow they often use other growth Pathways to be aggressive and actually I think they're more they're more worrisome
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
conversely if you have a a tumor that is in a low te environment I.E the original Publications we talked about an N anym way back or other anecdotal series those low the tumors that develop in a low te environment they're less dependent on androgens to grow they often use other growth Pathways to be aggressive and actually I think they're more they're more worrisome because you don't exactly know how you're going to attack it or treat it if it actually progresses