The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's a real interplay between telogen effluvium and male pattern hair loss in that the cycling of the hair follicle meaning that the loss of the hair and the regrowth of the follicle if that is accelerated then the actions of an androgenic alopecia and dht apoptosis and the stem cells in the hair follicle could be accelerated
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if i'm hearing you properly there's a real interplay between telogen effluvium and male pattern hair loss in that the cycling of the hair follicle meaning that the loss of the hair and the regrowth of the follicle if that is accelerated then the actions of an androgenic alopecia and dht apoptosis and the stem cells in the hair follicle could be accelerated