Peter Attia· MD
He's been on exogenous testosterone for 3 years. Presumably there are no sperm. I would bet 95% confidence that he would have no sperm in his
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
He's been on exogenous testosterone for 3 years. Presumably there are no sperm. I would bet 95% confidence that he would have no sperm in his
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
He's been on exogenous testosterone for 3 years. Presumably there are no sperm. I would bet 95% confidence that he would have no sperm in his.
I would bet 95% confidence that he would have no sperm in his semen. Okay. at 200 milligrams a week.
If you do it like a cycling effort, that's the best, right? So, if you cycle steroids, you recover the pituitary, you get back to normal, and then you hit it again. That's actually quite smart.
The recovery is usually possible in young men, but it depends on how much they took, how long they took it, and how they took it.
If a guy is taking exogenous testosterone, and let's just say he's been on it now for a few months, is he able to create sperm? 95% chance he's not.