The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i've seen um there's a guy who has his thyroid removed he's really optimized physical health metabolically just stellar and doesn't have to have a thyroid gland he's on ndt and he's okay with his free t3 at 2.9 which is a little bit below the mid-range of 3.1 on his laps and he's fine because he's probably t3 efficient he needs less to function which makes sense why i now need less than i once did
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
people optimized on a t4 t3 combo often times and again you are not targeting a number that is the wrong way to go about this it could be too much for you what one person needs in their t3 range may not be for you so but the average general of everyone that i see with labs and and doctors too is that people who are optimized on a t43 combination usually have a free t3 at least middle range if not above some towards the top of the range a little bit so let's say the middle of the range is 3.0 a patient would usually be maybe optimized 3.4 3.5 3.7 and that shouldn't worry anybody even though your free t3 is a normal person in this world who doesn't take thyroid hormone would not get above that and that might make you hyper metabolic but what those doctors aren't understanding is that you are not factoring in the fact that we are replacing this that we have shut down the feedback loops that make sense