The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you take a woman entering the normal perimenopausal to menopausal state and she has no pre-existing cardiovascular disease and I want to come back to how we'll define that but let's wait on a moment the data make it pretty clear there's no increase in her risk of cardiovascular disease ongoing correct not just four or five years correct
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.