The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
well it has to just there's a Time dependent co-variable here right so you you will when you have there's lots of things that testosterone does at a cellular level right it impacts um damage to the DNA repair of that damage to the DNA all these different things that people I don't think really fully appreciate
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think that you begin to Mark and see differences in terms of the epigenetics of different genes within a test an androgen responsive organ that then sets the stage for your potential risk for developing prostate cancer