Paul Saladino· MD
that in hunter-gatherer populations we don't necessarily see a trend
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
that in hunter-gatherer populations we don't necessarily see a trend
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and then there's no real drop off. So they're uh and they stay active and healthy uh relatively healthy uh throughout the rest of their lives. in the testosterone, they don't have that 1% uh loss say per year. And there's no problem with fertility even though their levels are much much lower than ours.