We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I've always personally thought a patient with a personal history of breast cancer not to say so we'll come back to family history personal history of breast cancer with the exception of that one patient who was adamant I mean her words were I would rather be on HRT then I would rather be dead and not be on HRT but I've always felt that that is that is a really scary place to be
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.