The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
she gets back to me with the tests sure enough not only is her free t3 suboptimal for being on her treatment the tsh looked good the free t4 looked good but this is why it's not the full picture reverse t3 in the range of 0 to 25 was 22 her ratio between the free t3 and the reverse t3 was 13. 20 and higher is usually best
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.