The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So what's you know that then you've got something interesting there right? So yeah there's the case the use case for desiccated organs in mainstream medicine is actually not zero right it's desiccated thyroid desecated um pancreas has been used historically in states of insulin uh inadequacy and desiccated brain has been used in cognitive clients pretty interesting stuff
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.