The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's an interesting study rats looking at essential fatty acid deficiency they really did not give these animals any linolic acid and compared it to a 4% linolic acid amount and in the animals that had essential fatty acid deficiency there were some problems but you're never going to be able to get your linolic acid to 05% again minus 1.3% of my calories these animals had a higher metabolic rate than the 4% uh dietary linolic acid animal
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.