The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
after our body is done with a hormone and it wants to get rid of it that hormone specifically dht binds with an enzyme called glucoronasil transferase and it becomes bound to glucuronic acid and it changes that hormonal structure from a lipid loving or a fat loving molecule that wants to attach to cell sites into a water loving molecule which increases its probability of entering into the small intestine so that our systems can flush it out
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
gut bacteria in the group of mice that had a microbiome we're producing this enzyme called beta glucaranadase as a byproduct of eating carbohydrates it's a byproduct of you know living off of fiber and all of the other other particles that these things feed off of they would produce this enzyme that would attach to glucuronidated dht dissociate the glucuronic acid from dht and then turn it back into its active form so that now there's a potential for that dht hormone to get sucked up by the enterocyte cells and then through the entero hepatic system get kicked back into the circulation system