The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but now that we understand epigenetics that's not really true I mean if you can have these super super low doses of these estrogen mimicking chemicals and yeah they're not poisonous but they are in a certain way because they're causing long-term health impacts including a lowering testosterone
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the idea here is that our bodies keep those hormones and very delicate ranges and when we start taking in exogenous or exterior sources of estrogen or even androgens which is seemingly more rare at least from environmental sources that can really throw out this delicate balance