The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
however other women let's say will say that they want to take hormone therapy even though they know that there may be X Y or Z increased risk because their symptoms are so bothersome they're so distressing they're being disrupted their sleep is being disrupted they are not being able to have work productivity their day-to-day activities are affected their quality of life is really impaired
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.