The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Depending on the age of the mother, your eggs are not viable a certain percent of the months that you menstruate. So it can range anywhere from like 25% up to like 75% for older women. For my age, I'm in my early 30s, I learned that somewhere around 40% of my eggs were just not viable based on nature.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.