Paul Saladino· MD
and this reverse t3 as we've been saying is essentially shutting things off it's putting the brakes on if you're in the icu if you have trauma if you have sepsis or if you're starving
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and this reverse t3 as we've been saying is essentially shutting things off it's putting the brakes on if you're in the icu if you have trauma if you have sepsis or if you're starving
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.