The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and let's say you learned oh you respond favorably to HCG you do not respond to the G&R oh well then the problem is something is wrong with the pituitary the pituitary is missing the signal yeah but maybe I've seen people diagnose adenomas by actually digging into that stuff
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and let's say you learned oh you respond favorably to HCG you do not respond to the G&R oh well then the problem is something is wrong with the pituitary the pituitary is missing the signal yeah but maybe I've seen people diagnose adenomas by actually digging into that stuff