The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what's the prevalence of clein filters one in 500 so it's quite common really that high yes just tell people what clein felters is it's a genetic abnormality where you have an extra X chromosome xxy so phenotypically you're a man phenotypically you're a man but there are issues infertility you can have gynecomastia uh they're typically long stature in nature
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
kleinfelter is it's a genetic abnormality where you have an extra X chromosome xxy so phenotypically you're a man phenotypically you're a man but there are issues infertility you can have gynecomastia uh they're typically long stature in nature um normal you can live in a normal sexual function uh they have no issues with Ed but the t is low