We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
So I'm not a pellet promoter or user because you get super physiologic levels and I can't take it out if you get a pellet put in. And so if you have deepening voice or clitoromegaly or you know a hair issues these are the challenges with some of these super physiologic levels.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So I'm not a pellet promoter or user because you get super physiologic levels and I can't take it out if you get a pellet put in and so if you have deepening voice or clitoromegaly or you know a hair issues these are the challenges with some of these super physiologic levels