The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and the data also I think are unambiguously clear that the if there's any negative effect of the combined hormone therapy in the Whi it had to be due to the mpa because the the conjugated equine estrogen group alone had breast cancer not only that they almost achieve statistical significance by 0.2 of a P value for a reduction in the incidence of breast cancer an effect that also has persisted for over 20 years this is looked at in every subanalysis
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.