Peter Attia· MD
and that was due primarily to the publication of a single large study called the Women's Health Initiative which you alluded to earlier
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and that was due primarily to the publication of a single large study called the Women's Health Initiative which you alluded to earlier
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Overnight it went it crashed to nothing. You're talking billions of dollars of an industry went to nothing. And the the people who were prescribing the hormone therapy were like, "This doesn't make any sense. I I do this I've been doing this for 20 years, 30 years. I don't have a clinic full of people who are dying of blood clots or heart attacks or who get breast cancer. Like this is not my clinic. Whose clinic is this?"