The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
As far as dermal absorption goes, consider this article, "Immunotoxicity and allergenic potential induced by topical application of perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOA, in a mouse model." So, the gist of this paper is that yes, when you put PFOA on mouse skin, there are immunologic and allergenic problems, probably hormone disruption as well.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.