The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when I think about PMS I think about it purely through the lens of the endocrine system right I think of it purely through the lens of when a woman is in her luteal phase that progesterone level has to rise for the placenta and then of course virtually every time it's a false alarm you don't need it you shed that lining and that progesterone level comes crash down and it's this crashing down a progesterone that has always interested me
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.