The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
conversely when you see low testosterone but low lh and low fsh the problem is usually central meaning there's something in the brain that isn't working and of course i'm i'm being a little tongue in cheek when i say that because it's not really the brain that's not working but there's something in that pathway either at the gnrh level or at the pituitary level
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
that's important from a clinical perspective because how we treat low testosterone when we do make the decision to treat it is highly dependent on being able to differentiate between those two paths