The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so the accurate test read 381 to the inaccurate 502 here's what's more telling was the estral so the estra dial on the accurate test the lcms was 18.3 and on the um enzyme base test it was 41.3 so that's more than a 2X difference
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so the enzyme based amuno assay for testosterone was 502 but the lcms was 381 so for people who want to know how to tell if the test is that one it says rash ecl a right beside it yeah so Roos is the company that provides the the the uh the assay for them but that's like the only thing I think it says underneath it to identify yeah yeah so that's a pretty big difference right me that's a 25% difference