The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's not as simple as looking at the total testosterone or even the free testosterone and determining if a person has low testosterone or low T and the reason for that is when you are measuring total testosterone you don't really know what the free T is
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
If your T is now 900 um and we haven't made a change during that period of time other than that T and you're telling me I don't really feel that much different. My hypothesis is you have a pretty low density of androgen receptors and they're largely saturated at 400 >> and interesting and therefore this isn't really the fix.