The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the main driver that people have always focused on the um the dependent kind of fuel for prostate cancer has always been post postulated to be testosterone and in a normal prostate cell we talk about these different thresholds obviously when uh a um the gland undergoes mutations prostate cancers develop some of the wiring is is is skewed and you can develop a cancer now
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.