The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if we spray chemicals and pesticides that are indicon disruptors and wipe out entire ecosystems and cause infertility and insects and frogs and amphibians and wipe out an entire ecosystem of a of a pond or geographic region we don't think that that's not going to
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if we spray chemicals and pesticides that are indicon disruptors and wipe out entire ecosystems and cause infertility in insects and frogs and amphibians and wipe out an entire ecosystem of a pond or geographic region we don't think that that's not going to somehow impact our endocrine systems it's biology we share common DNA with all of these other species it's going to impact us