The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we never want to wait until a woman is in that state where she has Flat Line estradiol Flatline progesterone Sky High FSH Sky High LH we want to do it long before that we want to do it as she's transitioning from this into that and that could be literally a year or two years prior to that state
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But I think we have to have a talk about hormone replacement. You have to catch those women before they're far along into menopause.