The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the most obvious explanation for the why is a behavioral difference, not a diff and the behavioral difference is driven by potentially the way their brains developed during that critical window of being bathed in testosterone as opposed to the differences in testosterone. one in a 5-year-old boy versus a 5-year-old girl, which are dimminimous.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the most obvious explanation for the why is a behavioral difference, not a diff and the behavioral difference is driven by potentially the way their brains developed during that critical window of being bathed in testosterone as opposed to the differences in testosterone in a 5-year-old. y old boy versus a 5-year-old girl which are dimminimous.