The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so the E are typically High the are pretty typically how high are the EAS uh 40 30 they're not super high but they are and it depends how far long you see them along the way F and LH are typically already elevated pretty high
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
they're so the E's are typically High the t's are pretty typically 40 30. they're not super high but they are and it depends on how far along you see them along with FSH and LH are typically already elevated pretty high