The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
men with lower testosterone this was in the New England Journal of Medicine were at risk for higher grade prostate cancers yes the the sort of teic explanation was at least this was my te logic explanation if you are developing prostate cancer in the presence of low androgens you have a very sensitive you have a cancer that's very sensitive and therefore is probably much higher grade
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so conceptually when I think about it okay let's just say that High T is is u in a supplemented or endogenous is you know this circles back to the discussion we had the the very beginning High te is associated with probably on average a more well differentiated tumor not 100% of the time but that's what it's actually doing biologically within the prostate gland it's differentiating these cells
in a normal prostate testosterone is is a is a differentiation Factor it will differentiate a a prosthetic cell towards a fully functional benign epithelial cell