Paul Saladino· MD
how does the genetic sensitivity argument address something this paradoxical
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
how does the genetic sensitivity argument address something this paradoxical
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
dht is also what causes or associates strongly with better facial hair regrowth with better chest growth so it's this hormone that's paradoxical it causes hair loss in the scalp but then it grows hair in the beard it grows hair in the chest and in other parts of the body