The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so where a lot of cardiovascular risk in women is more linear with aging so for the most part you know blood pressure and diabetes risk tends to be more of an aging effect rather than ovary effect lipids is one thing that really seems to be an ovary effect that we do see you know relatively acute changes in the lipid panel following the final menstrual period with this rise in total cholesterol and LDL
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
lipids is one thing that really seems to be an ovary effect that we do see you know relatively acute changes in the lipid panel following the final menstrual period with this rise in total cholesterol and LDL