Peter Attia· MD
but the New York Times headlined it saying hormones have no benefit even on quality of life by the way the 13% of the women who were symptomatic had a significant improvement but they will lost among the entire population
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but the New York Times headlined it saying hormones have no benefit even on quality of life by the way the 13% of the women who were symptomatic had a significant improvement but they will lost among the entire population
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.